Film Review
In one of the most eagerly awaited documentaries of recent years, Serge
Bromberg and Ruxandra Medrea piece together one of the most remarkable
stories in French cinema history, the story of Henri-George Clozot's
ill-fated lost masterpiece
L'Enfer.
Until recently, very little was known about this film. Those
involved in its production were reluctant to talk about it; the footage
that Clouzot recorded before the project was abandoned has never been
seen and was indeed thought to have been destroyed. What makes
this all the more bizarre is that
L'Enfer
was to have been Clouzot's greatest achievement, a film that could have
radically altered the landscape of cinema. Yet it was never
completed and has been an enigma for over four decades. Now,
finally,
L'Enfer has returned
- not as the complete, innovatively crafted drama that Clouzot had
envisaged, but as a fragmented marvel that provides a testament to the
limits of the creative mind, an illustration of how badly wrong things
can go when artistic indulgence is given free rein.
Serge Bromberg has made a career of recovering and restoring missing
classics through the production company he founded and runs, Lobster
Films. It was pure chance that led him to uncover the lost
footage of
L'Enfer, the most
significant cinematic discovery of the past few decades.
Bromberg's story began
in an almost surreal vein, when he found himself trapped in a lift for two
hours with Clouzot's widow Inès. The latter had
refused to cooperate with Bromberg in his quest to find the missing
footage of
L'Enfer but later
relented, seeing the lift incident as divine intervention (perhaps the
work of Clouzot's ghost). Bromberg's search led him to France's
national film archive, the CNC (le centre national du cinéma et
de l'image animée), which, to his incredulity, was in possession
of all 185 reels of film that Clouzot shot for
L'Enfer - 15 hours of footage that
included all of the camera negatives in virtually pristine
condition. This material had previously been held by the
insurance company which recompensed Columbia Films (the film's main
backer) after the project was abandoned in 1964. Bromberg and his
team were amazed not only by the quantity of footage that Clouzot had
amassed but by its quality. These 185 reels contained some of the
most remarkable images ever committed to celluloid, images that were
quite unlike anything that had ever been seen in a film by the
mid-1960s. The fact that the sound recordings were missing did
not diminish the significance of this find.
The recovered film stock for
L'Enfer
can be divided into two categories. First, there is location
footage which was shot on and around a lake in the Massif Central
region of France in July 1964. This consists of conventional
black-and-white footage, depicting everyday normality, and stark colour
sequences, portraying the main protagonist's distorted imaginary
world. The most daring of these is a sequence that was to have
been colour-reversed, so that the rich blue of the lake became blood
red; this necessitated that all of the actors involved be made-up and
dressed so that when the colour was reversed they would appear as they
would in real-life. Far more radical and mind-blowing is the set
of test shots which Clouzot and his team made prior to the location
shoot. These employed experimental techniques that incorporated
kinetic art and audio effects inspired by musique concrète in an
attempt to convey the inner world of the protagonist on his descent
into insanity. It is not known how, or indeed if, Clouzot
intended to incorporate these test shots into his final film, but as a
piece of art in their own right they have considerable merit and they
may conceivably have inspired a whole new approach to filmmaking had
they seen the light of day.
The plot of
L'Enfer could not
be more anodyne. A middle-aged man, Marcel Prieur, runs a hotel
in a rural area of France with his much younger wife
Odette. What begins as a harmonious idyll soon becomes a
living nightmare as Marcel starts to imagine that his wife is having a
series of illicit affairs with other men and women. Driven
insanely jealous, Marcel ultimately decides to kill his wife. The
film begins with Marcel having apparently murdered Odette with a razor
blade; we then see the events that led up to this tragic outcome in
flashback, through the confused prism of Marcel's deranged mind.
Although the story is childishly simple, Clouzot conceived the most
elaborate and ambitious way in which to tell it, not in the
conventional objective linear fashion, but as a subjective experience.
The spectator would be an active participant in the
drama, believing that he was Marcel, vicariously sharing his feelings and seeing
the world through his eyes. What Clouzot was striving for was the
ultimate in reality cinema - not passive viewing but genuine
participatory involvement.
To ensure that the film had box office appeal, Clouzot hired two big
name actors, Romy Schneider, aged 26, and Serge Reggiani, aged
42. Schneider was by this time a major star in France and
Germany, having found fame at an early age for her portrayal of the
young Elisabeth of Austria in the
Sissi
series of films. On the brink of lasting international stardom,
the young actress was determined to rid herself forever of the nice
girl image that Sissi had given her;
L'Enfer
would have radically altered how the public perceived her, no longer
the innocent classical heroine, but now the sensual mature woman who
could ignite a man's passions and lure him to his doom. Serge
Reggiani would also have benefited from the film's success if it had
been completed. At the time, his career was on the skids and the
leading role in an international hit movie would have provided a
welcome boost to his career. Alas, it was not to be.
Through firsthand accounts from those involved in its making,
Bromberg's documentary makes it clear just why
L'Enfer was doomed to fail.
If it had been made as Clouzot had originally intended, as a fairly
modest production shot in a similar manner to his previous films,
L'Enfer would have been an easy
ride for everyone. What derailed the project was the decision by
some well-meaning executives from Columbia Films to give the director a
blank cheque after seeing a few test sequences. Columbia had
employed the same foolhardy strategy the previous year, offering
unlimited resources to Stanley Kubrick to make
Dr Strangelove - a gamble that
paid off handsomely. Unfortunately, Clouzot lacked Kubrick's
discipline and the money he was showered in was squandered. For
his three-week location shoot, he assembled three camera teams,
comprising a hundred technicians and three renowned cinematographers
(Armand Thirard, Claude Renoir and Andréas Winding). The
intention was that this would make the shooting schedule more
efficient. In fact, it made no difference since Clouzot insisted
on overseeing the preparation work for each shot, leaving the other two
crews idle as he did so.
The boon of limitless resources very quickly proved to be the kiss
of death and the film's title (
Hell
in English) became all too appropriate. Clouzot would shoot
scenes over and over again, striving for perfection, perhaps not quite
knowing what he was looking for. And yet his freedom was entirely
illusory. Clouzot had just three weeks to complete his location
shooting, after which the lake which was central to the story was to be
drained as part of a hydro-electric project. With time running
out and very little being achieved, relations between the director and
his cast and crew could only turn sour.
Clouzot had a reputation for being a hard taskmaster but as the
location filming on
L'Enfer
slipped further and further behind schedule, his obsessive
perfectionism became unbearable for those working with him. His
principal actors were the ones who had to take the brunt of his
temper. In the end, Serge Reggiani became so upset by the
incessant abuse he received that he walked off the set, claiming to be
too ill to continue the shoot. Romy Schneider would end up
screaming at Clouzot and became utterly bewildered by what he was
trying to achieve. Reggiani was to have been replaced by
Jean-Louis Trintignant, but before any of Trintignant's scenes could be
shot Clouzot suffered a heart attack - the final catastrophe which
brought the production to a definitive halt. Although Clouzot
recovered and went on to make a few more films, work on
L'Enfer was abandoned. The
wonder project that became a nightmare for all concerned was
over. All footage was seized by the insurance company and the
film that could have redefined cinema in a massive way was lost, buried
in an unmarked grave.
Clouzot's film may have failed spectacularly, but Bromberg and Medrea's
documentary and partial reconstruction will ensure that it will not be
forgotten.
L'Enfer
d'Henri-Georges Clouzot is a beguiling film that provides a
fascinating insight into the creative process, not unlike Clouzot's own
Le Mystère Picasso (1956).
It shows how creative endeavour can go wrong, how an artist can lose
his way in the labyrinth that comes from having too much freedom and
too little sense of direction. Clouzot may not have given us a
completed film but he left us with some extraordinary images, including
some riveting shots of Romy Schneider at her most devastatingly
sensual. The latter are quite possibly the most captivating
images ever taken of this actress, luxuriating in her charm, beauty and
mystique.
L'Enfer could
have been a film that revolutionised the art of cinema in the 1960s, a
film that could have exposed as feeble pretentious posturing the
efforts of Clouzot's New Wave rivals. Instead, it was a doomed
exercise in artistic self-indulgence, the
Titanic of French
cinema. Watching the fractured remnants of this film, the words of Shelley seem
strangely fitting.
Look on my
works, ye mighty, and despair...
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.