Film Review
Jean-Paul Rappeneau followed his lavish and enormously successful
Cyrano de Bergerac
(1990) with an equally extravagant period romp,
Le Hussard sur le toit, a bold
attempt to combine the grandeur and poetry of the film that preceded it
with the adolescent gusto of the director's earlier
Les Mariés de l'an II
(1971). This time Rappeneau takes as his source a well-known
novel by the writer Jean Giono, whose works had often been adapted for
French cinema, most effectively by Marcel Pagnol in the 1930s (
Angèle,
La Femme du boulanger,
Regain).
Before he embarked on the project, the most ambitious of his career,
Rappeneau declared that it was impossible to adapt Giono's complex and
sprawling epic novel, and, judging by the ungainly cinematic monster he
ended up creating, he may well have been right.
Le Hussard sur le toit had a
colossal budget, a large proportion of which came from the French tax
payer in the form of generous subsidies. At a cost of 176
million French francs, this was to be the most expensive film made in
France at that time, and in purely visual terms it rivalled anything
made in Hollywood during the 1990s. The worldwide success of
Claude Berri's
Jean de Florette (1986)
spearheaded a dramatic revival of French cinema in the late 1980s, and
similar visually stunning slices of Provençal life, such as Yves
Robert's
La Gloire de mon père
(1990), were guaranteed international popularity (to the extent that
they ended up being parodied in TV commercials for a well-known brand
of beer).
Le Hussard sur le
toit capitalised on this fad for picturesque epics and proved to
be another box office hit, both in France (where it attracted an
audience of 2.5 million) and abroad. Critical reaction to the
film was mixed but it was still nominated for ten Césars,
winning awards for its cinematography and sound.
For all its bluster and over-egged artistry,
Le Hussard sur le toit essentially
boils down to a two-handed road movie in which a moody Olivier Martinez
lusts over Juliette Binoche (who tries unconvincingly to be impervious
to his charms) as they traipse across acres of chocolate box French
countryside, bumping into the odd celebrity actor along the way.
The chemistry between the two photogenic lead actors is just right but
both are let down by a mediocre script which fails to allow either of
their characters to develop. Martinez does a good impression of
someone who has just discovered he has been cast in a role that
Jean-Paul Belmondo turned down, whilst Binoche spends most of her time
looking as if she is advertising a brand of skin lotion. The edgy
rapport between these two instantly likeable actors keeps our attention
focused on the screen but fails to distract from the gaping hole that
is the non-existent plot.
For the most part,
Le Hussard sur le
toit is a plodding and drawn out affair that struggles to
justify its languorous two hours and twenty minutes of runtime.
The appeal of the Thierry Arbogast's sumptuous location photography
soon wears thin as the superficiality of the plot and characters
becomes painfully evident, and were it not for the stream of talented
supporting actors whizzing past the camera (François Cluzet,
Pierre Arditi, Isabelle Carré and - best of all - Jean Yanne),
the film would soon become unbearably monotonous. 1980s French
cinema was often, rightly, criticised for being 'all look and no
substance', and the same can equally be said of
Le Hussard sur le toit.
By the mid-1990s, weaned on over-generous government sponsorship, there
were signs that French cinema was coming dangerously close to the
Hollywood blockbuster model, favouring mindless spectacle over serious
dramatic content. Films such as the Luc Besson-produced
Taxi
(1998) and Claude Zidi's
Astérix et Obélix contre
César (1999) appeared to confirm this worrying trend,
but fortunately the late 1990s also saw the emergence of a whole new
wave of committed auteurs who ensured that French cinema remained as
rich and diverse as ever. The most disappointing thing about
Le Hussard sur le toit is that it
totally squanders the opportunity to bring to life a great work of
French literature and instead is content to be nothing more than an
overblown populist romp, strutting its gold-plated production values
like an overfed peacock but failing to leave a lasting impression.
© James Travers 2013
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Jean-Paul Rappeneau film:
Bon voyage (2003)
Film Synopsis
In the summer of 1832, Europe is in the grip of a terrible cholera
epidemic. With the demise of Napoleon and the disintegration of
the French Empire, Austria is poised to overtake Italy. Against
this turbulent backdrop, a brave young Italian soldier, Angelo Pardi,
undertakes a mission to save his country. He flees to southern
France on horseback to join his fellow patriots, intending to gather
together a small army to fight against the Austrians when they invade
his country. The cholera outbreak has decimated the region
and, worse, Angelo and his allies are pursued by merciless Austrian
agents. When all appears lost, Angelo takes shelter in a house in
the town of Manosque, where he meets Pauline de Théus, a young
noblewoman who lives alone. Moved by Pauline's generosity towards
him, Angelo takes her under his wing and offers his help in tracking
down her missing husband...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.