Film Review
After finding acclaim with his social drama
La Loi du marché
(2015), French director Stéphane Brizé nimbly switches genre
and takes up the challenge of adapting one of the great works of French literature,
Guy de Maupassant's 1883 novel
Une vie. It is not the first
novel that Brizé has adapted - he already proved himself up to the
task with his engaging 2009 romance
Mademoiselle Chambon
- but it is his first stab at a period piece, and with a sprawling saga that spans nearly
thirty years he more than has his work cut out. Alexandre Astruc previously
adapted the novel in 1958. with Maria
Schell and Christian Marquand in the lead roles, with only marginal success.
Critical reaction to Brizé's film has been pretty mixed, but it pulled
off a coup by winning the prestigious Prix Louis-Delluc (cinema's equivalent
to the Prix Goncourt) just a few weeks after its original French release
in November 2016.
The differences between
Une vie and Brizé's previous film
are not so immense as you might think. Both films revolve around a
single, sympathetic character who falls foul of the social conditions of
his/her time and is soon caught up in a vicious downward spiral. In
La Loi du marché the unfortunate protagonist is a middle-aged
man struggling to find work; in
Une vie, it is a naive woman from
an aristocratic family with too fanciful a notion about marriage and human
nature. Brizé's decision to present his latest film in the now
rarely used 4:3 aspect ratio (i.e. the old television format) was a deliberate
artistic choice, intended to help us appreciate his heroine's hopeless confinement
and her inability to free herself from the life that is imposed on her by
others. This, along with some remarkably expressive photography and
meticulous handheld camera work, give the film an intimacy that compels
us not only to sympathise with the central character, but to genuinely
feel
her distress as her world closes in on her, like some evilly conceived
iron maiden, crushing her romantic delusions and leaving her utterly bereft
of hope.
With only two hours in which to recount the events of 27 years in Jeanne's
adult life, Brizé was pretty well obliged to resort to some form of
narrative shorthand. Instead of abridging the narrative, which would
have been the more conventional and safer approach, he accelerates the exposition,
frequently using a succession of brief but succinct shots to represent long
passages in the novel. An obvious example is Jeanne's courtship and wedding,
which take up barely a few minutes of screen time but tell us all we need
to know. Although this approach weakens the film's coherence in places
(it helps if you take the trouble to read the novel beforehand) it does
give the film a vitality and completeness it might otherwise have lacked.
The passage of time is marked by the passing of the seasons, the moods
of the year always appearing to be in sympathy with the changing mood of
the heroine as life's experiences slowly wear her down. Brizé's
technique is strikingly impressionistic, capturing the essence of Jeanne's
tough existence without dwelling on specific incidents. As a
consequence, the film has a much more brutal feel than the original novel
and it feels more akin to Flaubert's
Madame Bovary, the earlier work
that provided the inspiration for Maupassant.
In her first significant screen role, Judith Chemla makes a lasting impression
as the ill-fated heroine Jeanne. Her gradual transformation, from
a silly romantic to a sad wreck of a woman prematurely aged by misfortune,
is heartbreaking to watch, and that she ages imperceptibly is as much a tribute
to her skill as an actress as it is to the fine work of the make-up artists.
Although Chemla monopolises our attention (naturally, as Brizé makes
her the focal point of the drama), the supporting performances are just as
worthy of praise - Jean-Pierre Darroussin, Yolande Moreau and Swann Arlaud
all service the film's subtle, understated approach admirably. There
is a distinctly Bressonian or Bergmanesque quality to Brizé's mise-en-scène
- the drama is always underplayed, the emotion carefully contained, and yet
the impact on the spectator is intense, sometimes viscerally so.
Une vie is Stéphane Brizé's most remarkable film to
date - a stark, savage and highly personal interpretation of an essential
work of French literature.
© James Travers 2017
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
In 1819, a young woman named Jeanne Le Perthuis des Vauds leaves the content
where she has been educated since childhood and returns to live with her parents on the family
estate in Normandy. As she helps out in the garden, her head full of
girlish fancies, Jeanne can hardly wait to begin her adult life in earnest.
It isn't long before her Prince Charming presents himself. Julien de
Lamare is just the man she knew she would marry - a handsome aristocrat whose
seductive charms no woman can resist. How happy she is when Julien
reciprocates her love and swears he will be hers for life. But the
wedding has scarcely passed before the reality of adult life begins to hit
Jeanne, dispelling her childish illusions. Julien is not the ideal
husband she has imagined him to be. He is selfish, changeable, even
cruel. But the worst is yet to come. Tired of his wife, Julien
begins having affairs with other women, setting in motion a chain of events
that will test Jeanne's capacity for endurance to the limit. Such is
life...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.