Film Review
Scott of the Antarctic was one
of Ealing Studios' most ambitious productions, one of the first films
made by the company to be shot in colour and one that provides an
authentic account of Captain Scott's ill-fated polar expedition of
1910-12. The film was perfectly judged to fit the mood of
post-war Britain with its portrayal of stiff-upper-lipped pluck in the
face of adversity and succeeded in vividly bringing to life a story
known to every schoolboy in the country.
The film was directed by Charles Frend, one of Ealing's finest
directors, best known for his realist wartime dramas
San Demetrio London (1943) and
The
Cruel Sea (1953). The distinguished cast is headed by
John Mills, always the obvious choice for the role of the archetypal
English hero, with sterling support from the likes of Derek Bond,
Harold Warrender, Kenneth More and James Robertson Justice. More
than anything, it is the realism that these peerless actors bring to
their portrayals which makes the film so poignant and compelling,
particularly in the later scenes when their characters' fate becomes all
too apparent.
Whilst the budgetary limitations are a little too evident in a few
places,
Scott of the Antarctic
still stands as one of Ealing's most visually impressive films.
The stunning location photography (shot in Norway and Switzerland),
inter-cut with some truly breathtaking colour footage of the Antarctic
Peninsula, achieves a near-documentary realism whilst
conveying the awesome splendour of the cruel continent that Scott and
his men sought to tame. Vaughan Williams' evocative score (which
the composer later reworked as his
Sinfonia Antartica) brings a lyrical
quality that greatly heightens the intensity of the viewing experience.
With Scott's own diary providing the basis for much of
the narrative, the film's depiction of events could
hardly be more authoritative.
Scott of the Antarctic is an
unusual film for the period in which it was made because it portrays
the virtues of courage and resolve in a deeply ironic light and is
almost a celebration of failure - a stark contrast to what we
find in the propaganda films that were made just a few years
earlier. Scott's errors of judgement are clearly signposted so
that the viewer is left in no doubt that ill-preparation and
over-confidence played as much a part in the failure of the expedition as
bad luck.
By 1948, the British Empire was rapidly becoming a thing of the past
and it was no longer appropriate or credible to portray Britain as an
invincible nation of flawless superheroes. Films such as this
began to show the British in a more honest, and arguably better light -
as a plucky little country determined to punch above its weight, whilst
abiding by the time-honoured traditions of decency and fair play.
Captain Scott is the quintessence of Britishness, a man who reached for
the sky only to fall headfirst into the metaphorical gunge tank of
history. This explains both why he is still feted as a national
hero and why this film about his one great failure is so fondly
remembered. Success isn't everything.
© James Travers 2009
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
In 1904, Captain Robert Falcon Scott returns to England after a survey
expedition of Antarctica, frustrated that so much has yet to be
discovered about the unknown continent. Determined to make a
return visit, the explorer immediately begins to raise funds for
another expedition, whose main objective will be to reach the South
Pole, a feat that no man has yet achieved. By 1910, Scott has
assembled a crew and has raised just enough money to make his dream a
reality, or so he thinks. His ship, the
Terra Nova, takes him and his team
as far as the Great Ice Barrier, an arduous 900 miles from the South
Pole. Here, Scott and his men set up a base camp where they
will sit out the six-month long sunless winter, ready to resume their
journey to the pole in the spring. News is received that the
Norwegian Roald Amundsen has mounted a rival, better equipped
expedition and has set up camp a mere few hundred miles
away. With the return of the sun, Scott's expedition begins
in earnest, but it soon becomes apparent that the explorer has
seriously underestimated the difficulties that lie ahead. The
motorised sledges which Scott had believed superior to dog sledges soon
break down in the extreme conditions of the Antarctic. Likewise,
Scott's decision to use ponies in place of dogs proves to be a
terrible mistake. After numerous setbacks, Scott and four of his
team finally reach their objective, only to find that Amundsen has
beaten them to it. His dreams shattered. Scott leads the return
back his base, but the weather conditions take a sudden turn for the
worse. Scott's failure will be crowned by the death of himself
and his four companions, just eleven miles from a camp stocked with a
plentiful supply of food and fuel. But his story is not
forgotten, for the diary he leaves behind provides a detailed and
lasting record of his final expedition.
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.