Film Review
Following on from his previous film,
Hadewijch
(2009), an agnostic's assault on the failings of modern
religion, director Bruno Dumont stays with the spiritual theme and
risks further censure as he delivers his most controversial commentary
on Christian mythology to date.
Hors Satan not only questions the most fundamental tenets of
Christianity (or indeed any religion) by challenging their moral basis,
it goes much deeper and compels us to reflect on the most basic
question: what is it about the human psyche that makes faith, an
unquestioning belief in the unknowable, so necessary?
Dumont's denial of the existence of an all-powerful, all-seeing deity
is as apparent here as it is in any of his previous films; the
particular concerns he expresses in
Hors
Satan are to do with the origins of faith and the power it has
to transform our lives, for good or for ill. Essential to any
religion is an acceptance of moral certainties. By blurring the
boundary between good and evil to the extent that it becomes impossible
to distinguish one from the other (murder is wrong, yet the killing of
a rapist is somehow justified), Dumont's film exposes the fallacy of
any belief system that relies so unequivocally on absolutes, and the
impression we are left with is that none of the established religions
is up to the job of serving our present spiritual and moral needs.
Hors Satan is a film of such
cold, blistering austerity that it chills the senses and troubles the
heart to watch it. There is no music to guide our emotions, and
there is virtually no dialogue. The soundtrack is dominated by
the unremitting sound of the wind blowing across a bleak rural
landscape, the eerie howling of demonic forces trying to gain purchase
on our world.
Yet for all its glacial detachment, the film is one
that is suffused with a raw, inexpressible beauty. The
unblemished picturesque setting (the Côte d'Opale on the Atlantic
coast of northern France) lends a mystical, timeless quality that makes
it easier for the spectator to accept some of the film's more fantastic
episodes (miracles that are twisted versions of those recounted in the
gospels of the New Testament). Watching
Hors Satan is an unsettling
experience, a kind of half-waking dream in which you
feel you are the subject of a frenzied medieval exorcism.
The film's beginning immediately calls to mind the famous sequence in
Carl Theodor Dreyer's
Ordet (1955) where a madman
wanders across a rural wilderness loudly professing that he is the Son
of God. The only difference is that in Dumont's film the lone
madman is genuinely alone, in a world where no one else believes in
anything and God is truly dead. More than Dreyer, the film's main
influence is Robert Bresson, a maverick cineaste who pushed filmmaking
technique and storytelling to the very limits of austere minimalism, in
an attempt to get at the fundamental truths of human experience.
In
Hors Satan, Dumont proves
himself to be a worth disciple of Bresson, even though his perspective
on faith and religion could hardly be more different.
Like Bresson, he chose non-professional actors for the lead roles (David
Dewaele and Alexandra Lematre) and insisted that they refrain from
displaying external emotions in their performances. The
film's two protagonists - an unnamed itinerant miracle worker and his
devoted Goth acolyte - haunt the landscape like two lost souls who
cannot quite make up their minds whether they are the central
characters in a Brontë novel or stray extras in a Hammer horror
film. Is it love or a shared communion with Divine forces that
binds the two characters to one another and gives their life meaning,
when all around them is a dead, faithless void? We cannot be sure
- given the choice between the mystique of the abstract and the shallow
thrill of cold certainty, Dumont will always go for the former.
Hors Satan has
been compared, often unfavourably, with Terrence Malick's
The Tree of Life (2011).
Whilst the two films address the same spiritual concerns, they are a
world apart in their approaches, and Dumont's film has none of the
cinematic artifice that makes Malick's so easy to engage with. Of
the two films, Dumont's is the more profound and original, the one true
eye-opener. It takes us on a journey that, once experienced, is
unlikely to be forgotten, one that forces us to see things within
ourselves that we could never have expected. The film's languorous pace, narrative
sparsity and brutal ransacking of Christian iconography will doubtless
prevent it from achieving the acclaim, let alone the audience, that it
deserves. But it is undoubtedly one of the most inspired
meditations on man's yearning for the Divine
that cinema has so far given us, a film of exceptional
daring, insight and subtlety.
© James Travers 2012
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Bruno Dumont film:
Camille Claudel, 1915 (2013)