Gandhi (1982)
Directed by Richard Attenborough

Biography / Drama / History
aka: Richard Attenborough's Film: Gandhi

Film Review

Abstract picture representing Gandhi (1982)
Richard Attenborough does a pretty good job of out-doing David Lean in the sprawling epic stakes with this lavish magnum opus, his ambitious account of the life of his personal hero Mahatma Gandhi.  Attenborough had long hankered after making this film and it took him twenty years to realise his life's ambition, with financial support from the Indian government.

The film has great strengths, but also many weaknesses.  Certainly, it is a visually stunning piece of cinema, its breathtaking panoramic shots of the Indian landscape imbuing it with a grandeur that befits its subject.  Ben Kingsley was a controversial choice at the time for the part of Gandhi, although his nuanced and engaging performance proved to be the film's greatest asset.  On the minus side, the film is unevenly paced and feels uncomfortably like what you might end up with if you hacked a ten-part TV drama-documentary into a feature film.  There is little in the way of forward momentum and at times the film just seems to drift, not quiet knowing where it is heading.

This is something of a missed opportunity, since it fails to go much beyond the Gandhi myth and appears to want merely to canonise instead of understanding the man who played such a pivotal part in India gaining independence from the British.  Attenborough is clearly so in awe of Gandhi that you wonder whether he was really the most appropriate person to direct the film.  Interestingly, he had approached the great Indian cineaste Satyajit Ray to make the film, but Ray declined as he was not a great admirer of Gandhi.

The failings in the screenplay are revealed by the way in which the other characters are presented, almost as inconsequential window dressing.  For example, Nehru is reduced to being a bland disciple of Gandhi, and, if you believe the film, he only became President of India because Gandhi wished it.  The film's superficial characterisation exposes a shocking lack of background research, something that risks distorting the truth merely to reinforce the simplistic view that Gandhi, a living saint, created modern India single-handedly.

Somewhat all too predictably, the film had a massive impact at the Oscars, winning in eight of the eleven categories it was nominated for.  It won the Best Picture and Best Director awards, Ben Kingsley walked away with the Best Actor award, and awards were given for its art direction, screenplay, cinematography and costume design.  The film was broadly well received by the critics when it was first seen, although it is generally somewhat less well-regarded today.

The film's simplistic depiction of real events and its irksome blockbuster excesses (which include a needlessly star-studded cast) somehow diminish it as a tribute to Gandhi, a man who shunned personal glory and rejected material comfort for most of his life.  It might even be said that the film is a vulgar trivialisation of Gandhi's achievements, promulgating the popular myth whilst not really coming to grips with the man himself.  The film is impressive as a piece of cinema in its own right, but as a meaningful biopic it is woefully inadequate.
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Richard Attenborough film:
A Bridge Too Far (1977)

Film Synopsis

After being subjected to racial intimidation in South Africa, Indian lawyer Mohandas Gandhi organises a non-violent campaign of opposition to the country's discriminatory laws.  When he succeeds in getting these laws repealed, he returns to his native India, and a hero's welcome.   Gandhi is persuaded to support the campaign for Indian independence, but he does so on the understanding that there will be no violence on the Indian side.  Despite various attempts by the British to break his will and his influence over the Indian population, Gandhi remains adamant that, sooner or later, his people will be free to govern their own affairs.  But when independence comes, in 1947, India's problems are far from over.  As Hindus and Muslims come to blows over who will now govern the country, India risks erupting into bloody civil war...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.


Film Credits

  • Director: Richard Attenborough
  • Script: John Briley
  • Cinematographer: Ronnie Taylor, Billy Williams
  • Music: Ravi Shankar
  • Cast: Ben Kingsley (Mahatma Gandhi), Candice Bergen (Margaret Bourke-White), Edward Fox (General Dyer), John Gielgud (Lord Irwin), Trevor Howard (Judge Broomfield), John Mills (The Viceroy), Martin Sheen (Walker), Ian Charleson (Charlie Andrews), Athol Fugard (General Smuts), Günther Maria Halmer (Herman Kallenbach), Saeed Jaffrey (Sardar Patel), Geraldine James (Mirabehn), Alyque Padamsee (Mohammed Ali Jinnah), Amrish Puri (Khan), Roshan Seth (Pandit Nehru), Rohini Hattangadi (Kasturba Gandhi), Ian Bannen (Senior Police Officer), Michael Bryant (Principal Secretary), John Clements (Advocate General), Richard Griffiths (Collins)
  • Country: UK / India
  • Language: English
  • Support: Black and White / Color
  • Runtime: 188 min
  • Aka: Richard Attenborough's Film: Gandhi

Continental Films, quality cinema under the Nazi Occupation
sb-img-5
At the time of the Nazi Occupation of France during WWII, the German-run company Continental produced some of the finest films made in France in the 1940s.
The best of Russian cinema
sb-img-24
There's far more to Russian movies than the monumental works of Sergei Eisenstein - the wondrous films of Andrei Tarkovsky for one.
The best of American film noir
sb-img-9
In the 1940s, the shadowy, skewed visual style of 1920s German expressionism was taken up by directors of American thrillers and psychological dramas, creating that distinctive film noir look.
The history of French cinema
sb-img-8
From its birth in 1895, cinema has been an essential part of French culture. Now it is one of the most dynamic, versatile and important of the arts in France.
The best French war films ever made
sb-img-6
For a nation that was badly scarred by both World Wars, is it so surprising that some of the most profound and poignant war films were made in France?
 

Other things to look at


Copyright © filmsdefrance.com 1998-2024
All rights reserved



All content on this page is protected by copyright