Film Review
There have been numerous film adaptations of Robert Louis Stevenson's
The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde,
but the one that stands out from the crowd is
Rouben Mamoulian's 1931 version, now considered a classic of the horror
genre. Some inspired direction and groundbreaking camerawork,
complemented by outstanding performances from Fredric March and Miriam
Hopkins, make this an early triumph of sound cinema, a film that is
highly regarded to this day, and not just by the horror
aficionados.
Rouben Mamoulian's flair for innovation is apparent right from the very
first scene of the film, with an extended point-of-view sequence which
immediately puts the audience in the position of the main protagonist,
Dr Jekyll. This technique is used later in the film, very
effectively, on the first occasion when Jekyll transforms into
Hyde. The spectator
becomes Dr
Jekyll, experiencing this first stunning transformation through his
senses. As Jekyll's laboratory spins around him (achieved by
rotating the camera on its axis at high speed), a flurry of montage
shots are superimposed to show us what is passing through the doctor's
mind. The outcome of the experiment is then revealed to us when
we see reflected in a mirror the wondrous spectacle of Dr Jekyll slowly
morphing into Mr Hyde.
The transformation was ingeniously realised by using a series of
coloured filters which gradually exposed layers of makeup on Fredric
March's face. Some seamless jump-cutting moves the transformation
along to its shocking climax, with March's physiognomy completely
altered to that of a sinister-looking Neanderthal. For each
successive transformation, Hyde's features are rendered increasingly
repulsive until, in the final manifestation, he is a gruesome Satanic
monstrosity. It is this representation of Mr Hyde that is most
often used in spoofs
and comic books, one that portrays the baser side of civilised man as a
throwback to his primitive ancestry. Not surprisingly, March
found the make-up extremely uncomfortable to wear and was almost
permanently disfigured when the final batch of make-up was applied (in
fact he was hospitalised for several weeks immediately after his work
on the film had been completed).
Paramount originally wanted John Barrymore to recreate
his Jekyll and Hyde portrayal of the studio's silent
1920 version.
Although he was offered a substantial fee, Barrymore was committed to
work at MGM and so was unavailable for the film. Fredric March
was offered the role mainly through his striking physical resemblance
to Barrymore, although he was at the time only known for playing light
comedic parts. Just as the 1920 version of
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde had set
John Barrymore's film career in motion, this 1931 remake would
establish Fredric March as one of Hollywood's most sought-after actors.
The bravura performance that is widely considered one of March's
greatest won the actor his first Oscar in 1932.
In comparison with the vast majority of films made in the early 1930s,
Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde has an
extraordinary fluidity and pace, which is achieved through extensive
camera motion and some very slick editing. Cinematographer Karl
Struss reemployed some of the stylistic techniques (such as use of the
subjective camera) that he had perfected on Fred Niblo's silent
masterpiece
Ben-Hur
(1925). Mamoulian's penchant for the sensual (which would later
get him into trouble during the making of the Greta Garbo classic
Queen Christina (1933)) is
evidenced by the overt sexuality in the simmering scenes with Fredric
March and Miriam Hopkins. The sequence in which Hopkins strips in
front of March was extremely raunchy for its day and is loaded with
enough Freudian symbolism to sink a frigate. Not surprisingly,
when the film was re-issued in 1935, many scenes had to suffer
substantial cuts in order to comply with the Hollywood production code,
which came into force shortly after its original release.
Some overseas releases suffered even worse at the hands (or rather
shears) of the censors. It has
been commented that the British version of the film was so badly cut
that Miriam Hopkins is hardly seen in it.
In common with many film studios, Paramount had been badly hit by the
Great Depression. The company gambled that prestige productions
such as
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
would improve its balance sheet and see it through a difficult economic
period. Although this film was one of the biggest box office hits
of the year, its success was not enough to save Paramount from
bankruptcy in 1933.
When MGM decided to make their own version of
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in 1941,
with Spencer Tracy in the leading dual role, the studio insisted on
seizing and burying every surviving print of the 1931
version. Against the odds, the film has survived and can be
seen today almost as it was on its first release, with all of its
naughty bits pretty well intact.
The 1931 version of
Dr. Jekyll and
Mr. Hyde deserves its reputation as one of the great horror
classics of Hollywood's Golden Age, ranking alongside Universal's
legendary monster movies, such as
The Phantom of the Opera (1925)
and
Frankenstein (1931). There are Gothic thrills galore as Mr Hyde
becomes increasingly wild and sadistic, terrorising women and killing
without the least compunction. But there is also an emotional
realism, a humanity to the film which makes it much more than just a
mindless horror flick.
Whereas as Stevenson's novella was an exploration of the dual nature of
man, exposing the vile corruption that lay beneath the surface of
Victorian respectability, this film is a dark and intelligent study in
desire, eloquently warning that repression can be just as dangerous as
self-indulgence. Jekyll's transformation to a lecherous fiend
isn't so much the result of pent-up lust as a consequence of one man's
inability to accept the fundamental truth that the pleasure-seeking
savage is an inescapable component of the human psyche. This is
the one adaptation of his work of which Robert Louis Stevenson would
have approved.
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
Dr Henry Jekyll, a renowned medical practitioner and philanthropist, is
anxious to marry the woman he loves, Muriel Carew, but the latter's
father insists that he must wait awhile yet for decorum's
sake. To distract himself, Jekyll immerses himself in his
scientific research, convinced that he can develop a potion which will
separate the two opposing sides in man's nature, the good and the
evil. This proves to be a dangerous hobby since, by drinking such a
potion, Jekyll succeeds in transforming himself into an uncouth apelike
monstrosity, Mr Hyde. Relieved of Jekyll's scruples and
inhibitions, Hyde cavorts around the less salubrious areas of London,
and takes as his mistress a young music hall singer, Ivy
Pearson. Fortunately, the process is reversible, and, having had
his bit of recreational therapy, Jekyll is able to return to his former
saintly self by imbibing another potion. When General Carew
finally consents to allow his daughter to marry, Dr Jekyll is
ecstatic. He can now live the life of connubial bliss of which
has dreamed for so long. But then he receives an unexpected visit
from Ivy Pearson. Not knowing that Jekyll and Hyde are one in the
same man, Ivy begs him to help her. Jekyll assures the distressed
woman that she will see no more of her tormenter. Mr Hyde is dead
and buried. Alas, Dr Jekyll could not be more wrong...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.