Film Review
It would appear that films about Coco Chanel are like London
buses. You can hang about for ages waiting for one to turn up and
when one finally does put in an appearance another comes along in its
slipstream a split second later. Not long after Anne Fontaine
shed some light on Chanel's early life in
Coco avant Chanel, Jan Kounen
delivered this follow-up biopic which traces the fashion icon's later
life, focussing on her association with the great Russian composer Igor
Stravinsky. Neither film really does justice to its subject and
both seem to be more preoccupied with style than substance.
Kounen's is probably the more interesting and stylistically adventurous
film, although its numerous attempts to draw direct parallels between
the two creative talents it depicts do occasionally veer towards the
frankly ridiculous.
Coco Chanel et Igor Stravinsky
is based on the 2002 biographical novel by Chris Greenhalgh, who
contributed to the screenplay. Incredible as it may seem, the
film was originally intended to be directed by William Friedkin, the
man who brought us the horror classic
The
Exorcist (1973), and was to have starred Marina Hands, who
recently found international fame through Pascale Ferran's
Lady Chatterley (2003).
In the end, the part of Coco Chanel was given to Anna Mouglalis, an
actress-turned model who became the face of Chanel in a high-profile
marketing campaign in 2003. Friedkin was replaced by Jan Kounen,
an equally improbable choice of director given that the latter is best
known for his visceral action-thriller
Dobermann (1997).
With her glacial composure, deep sensual voice and elegant bearing,
Anna Mouglalis looks as if she was manufactured specifically for the
role of Coco Channel. She is certainly far more convincing in the
part than the waif-like gamine Audrey Tautou. Mouglalis
epitomises the modern woman of the 1920s, free-spirited, exotic and
confident, yet she also exudes an aura of dark melancholy. It's a
lonely business being a genius, a sentiment that is echoed by Mads
Mikkelsen's equally laudable portrayal of Igor Stravinsky. Both
lead actors convey an air of tragic solitude which serves the film
well. There is something artificial about their characters'
amorous entanglement, an attempt to grasp something which neither can
possess, a desire that can never be satisfied. Completing
the fraught love triangle is Catherine, Stravinsky's consumptive wife,
played with equal conviction and intensity by another notable acting
talent, Yelena Morozova.
The performances are easily the best thing about this film.
Stylistically, it is something of a mixed bag, superficially impressive
but not entirely palatable. The film begins magnificently with an
authentic recreation of the notorious first performance of Stravinsky's
The Rite of Spring in Paris in
May 1913. Before we know what is happening we are subjected to
the slightly surreal spectacle of a violent confrontation between
modern art and delicate bourgeois sensibility, with modern art failing
to win many converts (apparently, it didn't take much to tranform an
audience of ballet-loving toffs into a rabble of mud-slinging hooligans
in those day). After the obligatory newsreel footage of the First
World War and the Russian Revolution, the film begins proper and falls
back several gears, settling into the slow tempo of a gently simmering
chamber piece, something that feels flat and listless after the
spectacular opening sequence. The deficiencies in the script are
compounded by some painfully mechanical mise en scène, although
this is at least partly redeemed by the sheer elegance of the
photography and the haunting lyricism of a score which pays a
respectful homage to Stravinsky's work.
For a romantic drama,
Coco Chanel et
Igor Stravinsky is a surprisingly passionless affair. Far
from being erotic and sensual, the love scenes have a marble-like
froideur, possessing something of the raw carnality of the works of
Lucien Freud. This may have been deliberate, intended to
convey the artificial and ephemeral nature of Chanel and Stravinsky's
romantic association. Although this liaison may have, as
the film conjectures, given a temporary boost to the protagonists'
careers, it is apparent that it is never going to develop into an amour
fou, and you can't help feeling that the film is perhaps slightly
overstating the significance of Channel and Stravinsky's amorous
fling. Whilst the film is far from perfect, it still
manages to be a strangely compelling piece, somewhat more involving and
nuanced than Anne Fontaine's more conventional Coco biopic.
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
In Paris, 1913, Gabrielle "Coco" Chanel is beginning to make a name for
herself as a couturiere. Meanwhile, at the Théâtre
des Champs-Elysees, Igor Stravinsky is staging his avant-garde ballet
The Rite of Spring. Coco is
greatly impressed by this production but the reaction of the other
spectators is far from positive and the show ends in a noisy
riot. Seven years later, at the height of her success, Coco is
devastated by the untimely death of her lover Boy Capel.
Stravinsky is now a hard-up refugee in Paris, a fugitive of the Russian
Revolution. When their paths cross, they are magnetically drawn
to one another. Stravinsky gladly accepts Coco's offer to stay at
her villa at Garches, the perfect place for him to resume his
work. Thus begins a passionate liaison between two creative
geniuses...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.