Film Review
We owe Eddie Constantine far more than we thought. If it hadn't
been for him, or rather the cinematic disaster
Feu à volonté (1965)
to which he lent his dubious talents, Marcel Ophüls' career path
may have looked very different. Instead of becoming a
world-renowned documentary filmmaker, Ophüls may conceivably have
stuck to turning out third rate potboilers (of the Lemmy Caution
variety) for less discerning mainstream audiences. This is one of
the more believable revelations that spring, jack-in-a-box-like, from
Marcel Ophüls' long overdue self-portrait, released in France
under the title
Un voyageur
and almost everywhere else as
Ain't
Mishavin. The latter title, taken from the famous song by
jazz legend Fats Waller, is the one that suits the film best, betraying
as it does the maverick persona and mischievous sense of fun of its
author. Now in his 85th year, Ophüls still clearly relishes
a controversy and it is with a fierce gusto that he sets about
eradicating his own mystique in what we fear may well be his swansong.
There are two facts about Marcel Ophüls that are known to just
about everyone. First, he is the son of the highly regarded
German-born filmmaker Max Ophüls, who is remembered mainly for the
fine series of films he made in France in the 1950s, including
La
Ronde (1950) and
Madame de... (1953).
Secondly, he is the man who made
Le Chagrin et la pitié
(1969) (a.k.a.
The Sorrow and the
Pity), a landmark documentary that revealed some unpalatable
truths about the French nation at the time of the Nazi Occupation
during WWII. This is the film that put Ophüls Junior in the
same bracket as his illustrious father (as far as worldwide
appreciation of his work goes). Not only did this film finally
lay to rest the old De Gaulle myths about France's period of
Occupation, it also proved to be hugely influential, providing a
template for the modern critical documentary.
Le Chagrin et la pitié had
such a wide-reaching and enduring impact that it hardly matters that
Marcel Ophüls made two other substantial films after this:
The Memory of Justice (1976), a
daring attempt to compare Nazi war crimes with the United States'
involvement in Vietnam; and
Hôtel
Terminus (1989), an account of the life of the Nazi war
criminal Klaus Barbie which won Ophüls his Oscar.
In total, Marcel Ophüls made around twenty films for the cinema
and television. What is less well-known is that he started out as
an actor in Hollywood, working as an extra, before becoming an
assistant for his father. Perhaps the most curious thing about
Ophüls' self-portrait is that he has so little to say about his
own work. The brouhaha in France surrounding
Le Chagrin et la pitié
(which led it to be banned for over a decade) hardly gets a mention,
and Ophüls' only interest in the film appears to be the letter he
received from Woody Allen thanking him for allowing him to mention it
in
Annie Hall (1977). This
is no false modesty; Ophüls just cannot help downplaying his
achievements and is openly suspicious of any praise that comes has
way. At one point, he remarks that critics feel bound to flatter him
out of respect for his father.
Marcel Ophüls has far more to say about his father than himself,
from which we may safely conclude that Max Ophüls was the most
important figure in his life. Marcel certainly doesn't stint
himself when dishing out the juicy anecdotes about his father,
particularly those relating to his colourful and taxing time in
Hollywood in the 1940s. Preston Sturges is cast as the principal
villain of the piece, the monomaniac who made a habit of dragging
people back to his house so that he could show them his films. It
was Sturges who (we are told) subjected Max Ophüls to the ultimate
humiliation, only allowing him to say "Action!" and "Cut!" during their
doomed collaborative effort on Howard Hughes'
Vendetta (1950). As his
father traipsed from studio to studio, struggling to find someone who
would take him seriously, young Marcel was becoming a fully fledged
cinephile, developing a voracious appetite for American cinema,
from Groucho Marx to Josef von Sternberg.
Max Ophüls' late success in France in the early 1950s made him
something of an idol for the reviewers on Les Cahiers du Cinéma,
particularly a new firebrand recruit named François
Truffaut. A man who was constantly in search of a father figure,
Truffaut became Max Ophüls' fondest admirer, and it was
inevitable that he should also become a close friend of his son.
It was Truffaut who gave Marcel Ophüls his first break, the
opportunity to direct a short film in the anthology
Love at Twenty (1962). After
this, Truffaut persuaded Jeanne Moreau to take the lead in Marcel
Ophüls' first feature,
Peau de banane (1963), a comedy
caper movie that was to be the director's only successful fictional
film. After the aforementioned disastrous collaboration with
Eddie Constantine, Ophüls gave up fiction and opted to become a
documentary filmmaker for French television, his first notable work
being
Munich or Peace in Our Time
(1967), followed by the film that made him both famous and infamous,
Le Chagrin et la pitié.
The emotion that Marcel Ophüls displays whenever he mentions
Truffaut's name, even in passing, speaks volumes of the closeness of
their friendship. How bizarre then that, whilst having a friendly
chat with Jeanne Moreau in a restaurant, he suddenly asks whether
Truffaut was having a secret affair with his wife. It is just the
kind of random, off-kilter digression that Ophüls
would make, reminding us just what
a live wire he had been for much of his career, asking the questions
that no one else dared to ask and showing us just what a malleable
commodity truth is. Ophüls throws another curved ball when
he asserts that a documentary can never be entirely objective and must
therefore be considered a work of fiction. By choosing where to
point his camera, the documentarist is bound to adopt a point of view,
which may or may not be valid but can never be the
whole truth. This admission
of partiality is succinctly expressed by Ophüls when he and the
BBC journalist John Simpson improvise a rendition of the Marx Brothers
song "Whatever It Is, I'm Against It!" (Neither of them should
give up the day job.)
Rather than bore us with a formal, well-structured account of his life,
Marcel Ophüls opts for something completely different - a
colourful and chaotic collage that feels like a messy scrapbook of
memories. Appropriately for a filmmaker who spent much of his
career sniffing out unsavoury truths and causing controversy at almost
every turn there seem to be no no-go areas. Ophüls talks
candidly about his marital disharmony, his suicide attempts, his
professional failures and his missed opportunities (which include
turning down Marlene Dietrich for an amorous liaison - well, she was
old enough to be his mother). From the jovial tone of his film,
Ophüls is clearly a man who has few regrets and who is glad to
have lived a full and happy life. Almost twenty years after
his last documentary,
Veillées
d'armes (1994), he turns up unannounced like an ageing rocker
desperately in need of an adrenalin fix. A born raconteur, Marcel
Ophüls has no difficulty holding our attention as he takes his
random walk through his life, dropping names as carelessly and as
gratuitously as a Cockney drops his aitches, punctuating his story with
film clips that range from
Blonde Venus (1932) and
The Wizard of Oz (1939) to
just about every film made by his father.
Ain't Misbehavin is as illuminating
as it is enjoyable, a characteristically idiosyncratic self-portrait
from one of cinema's true mavericks.
© James Travers 2013
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Marcel Ophüls film:
Peau de banane (1963)