Film Review
This superlative adaptation of Robert Bolt's stage play marked
something of a departure for director Fred Zinnemann, who was
previously known for such big budget Hollywood offerings as
High Noon (1952),
From Here to Eternity (1953)
and
Oklahoma! (1955).
Although it has production values to match any of Zinnemann's earlier
films,
A Man for All Seasons
is a much more focused and restrained drama, which manages to be both
literary and accessible, a rare feat for a period drama.
Although the film's visuals are impressive, offering an authentic
recreation of Tudor England, the thing that most steals our attention
are the captivating character performances from an extraordinarily
talented cast. In his first substantial film role, Paul Scofield
beguiled audiences with his portrayal of Sir Thomas More, the part he
had previously played in the acclaimed West End production.
Although the film offers many great performances (Robert Shaw and Leo
McKern are both excellent as King Henry and Cromwell respectively), it
is Scofield's vivid and humane portrayal of Thomas More which makes
this such a memorable and stirring film.
The film's producers were astounded when it proved to be a box office
hit (they were particularly concerned about not having an established
star in the leading role and it was only through Zinnemann's insistence
that Scofield was given the job). And the critics loved it as
much as the public. The film won six Ocars, with awards for Best
Picture, Best Director Best Actor (Paul Scofield), Best Adapted
Screenplay, Best Color Cinematography and Best Costume
Design. Wendy Hiller was nominated for the Best Actress
Oscar and gives a heart-rending performance as More's pragmatic
wife. John Hurt is just as impressive as the self-serving Richard
Rich, the part that launched his career.
A Man for All Seasons is
period drama at its best, intelligently written, beautifully crafted
and played to perfection by some of Britain's finest acting
talents. What makes it particularly praiseworthy is Paul
Scofield's unbeatable performance, which is an acting master class in
its own right. Who else could portray Thomas More with such
authority and poignancy, helping us to see, through a gripping moral and intellectual
conflict, the value of integrity (a rare virtue these days)? A powerful film, powerfully delivered by true
masters of their craft.
© James Travers 2009
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Fred Zinnemann film:
The Day of the Jackal (1973)
Film Synopsis
England, 1527. King Henry VIII needs to divorce his barren wife
Catherine of Aragon so that he can marry Anne Boleyn and ensure the
Tudor succession. When Cardinal Wolsey fails to obtain an
annulment from the Pope, Thomas More replaces him as Lord Chancellor,
but he soon loses the King's favour when his unwillingness to support
the divorce becomes apparent. Realising that the Pope will
never agree to dissolve his marriage, King Henry severs all ties with
Rome and appoints himself Supreme Head of the Church of
England. Those who are close to the King are compelled to
sign an oath which acknowledges his supremacy over the Pope, but Sir
Thomas refuses and has no choice but to resign his position. The
King's adviser and supreme judge Thomas Cromwell interprets this as an
act of treason...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.