Film Review
The Martian Chronicles is the
most celebrated of Ray Bradbury's literary achievements, a collection
of short stories which form a loose narrative detailing man's
colonisation of the planet Mars in the first decade of the 21st
century. In common with the best offerings in the science-fiction
genre, the book is not a prediction of future events (evidenced by the
fact that a manned expedition to Mars is still many years away from us
and may in fact never happen), but an allegory of present realities on
Earth, drawn from the writer's own personal preoccupations. What
concerned Bradbury most in the 1940s and 1950s and inspired him to
write his most famous work was the destructive impact of crass
materialism on humanity's better qualities - creativity, respect for
the environment, respect for one's own culture and that of other races,
etc. Reading
The Martian
Chronicles today, it is surprising how much of a resonance it
has. Its prescience lies not in its fanciful account of the
colonisation of another world, but in its bleak anticipation of what
mankind is destined to become.
Attempts to adapt
The Martian
Chronicles have defied filmmakers since the 1950s and it wasn't
until the late 1970s that a British-American consortium of companies,
including the BBC and Charles Fries Productions, made a first stab at
it with an ambitious three-part mini-series which ran to four and a
half hours. The timing for this most ambitious of television
ventures could hardly be better. Science-fiction on the big and
small screens was enjoying a massive boom, in the wake of the worldwide
success of
Star Wars (1977) and
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
(1977). The viewing public just couldn't get enough sci-fi and
The Martian Chronicles was sure to
attract immense audiences around the world. With a stellar cast
headed by iconic actor Rock Hudson, the series that consisted of three
feature-length episodes was hyped as the television event of the
decade. Of course, it was destined to be a total misfire.
The most obvious weakeness of the production was that it relied on
special effects to be convincing, and the sad fact was that effects
technology was still very much in its infancy. Without the
astronomical budget of a major Hollywood blockbuster, any
science-fiction drama made for television was inevitably going to fall
short of expectations. After witnesses the spectacular effects in
Star Wars, television
audiences were unlikely to impressed by the amateurish model work and
sloppy post production offered by
The
Martian Chronicles. (The Martian exteriors were filmed on
Malta and Lanzarote and no attempt was made to treat the film to remove
the bright blue skies and fluffy white clouds that totally spoil the
illusion.) Things get off to a bad start with real footage
of one of the Apollo missions switching to an unconvincing shot of a
plastic toy rocket flying through a poor imitation of space. The
first scene on Mars, with bald, gold-eyed aliens resembling
something from a 1950s comic strip, looks like something Ed Wood may have knocked up in
his garage, studio-bound schlock that makes the
first series of
Star Trek
(made 13 years previously) look bold and sophisticated. The
design, effects and direction all conspire to create an impression of
cheapness and ineptitude, right from the beginning of this supposed
television milestone. Even the early black and white episodes of
Lost in Space look good compared
with this.
It does get a
little better
as things progress. The account of the Second Expedition is
somewhat more involving (partly because there are no effects involved
and it has a contemporary Earth setting) and there is a genuine eerie
quality about it. Thereon, it's a pretty patchy affair, with
occasional moments of brilliance sandwiched between long, wearying
deserts of godawfulness. The series' absolute nadir is its one
excursion into outright comedy, with an incredibly unlikeable
Christopher Connelly chasing after the last woman on Mars to find that
she is even more nauseating than he is. This is followed by an
equally toe-curling episode in which Darren McGavin (the most
irritating actor in the entire production) is chased by Martians in the
manner of a cheap western, with ludicrous model shots destroying the
illusion totally. Fritz Weaver's close encounter with celestial
balls delivers another low-point and an excuse for some pious waffle
that makes viewing with a sick bag mandatory. These leaps into
the abyss of mediocrity would be tolerable if the rest of the
production was up to scratch, but unfortunately it isn't.
The Martian Chronicles is an
arduous trudge across a drawn-out pedestrian narrative which is as
arid, airless and unappealing as the Martian surface itself.
It's easy to blame it all on the effects technology that was available
at the time, but there were plenty of sci-fi and fantasy television
shows of this era which managed to make respectable viewing with
primitive special effects. It's tempting to blame the writer
Richard Matheson, that veteran of the sci-fi genre whose screenwriting
efforts never matched up to the brilliance of his published
novels. The dialogue may be appalling in parts, but Matheson does
a reasonable job of imposing a narrative structure on Bradbury's
loosely connected short stories. It's easier to lambaste the
actors, most of whom seem to have no idea what planet they're on, let
alone who they are supposed to be playing. All of the above must
share some of the blame for this monumental disaster but the real
culprit is its director, Michael Anderson, who was the kiss of death to
just about every genre film he came within spitting distance of.
Anderson was presumably hired to direct the film when his previous
sci-fi atrocity
Logan's Run (1976) had proven
to be a surprise hit at the box office (igniting the sci-fi camp fire
that
Star Wars would turn
into a raging conflagration). Before this, Anderson had scored a
hit with
Around the World in 80 Days
(1956) and was still revered for his patriotic wartime drama
The
Dam Busters (1954). Anderson was certainly a competent
film director who, when given a straight drama, seldom failed to
deliver the goods. But when tasked with something requiring
subtlety, flair and imagination, he was way out of his depth, as is
painfully evident in almost every shot of
The Martian Chronicles.
Imagine how much greater this series might have been if Steven
Spielberg or George Lucas had been entrusted with it. Giving it
to Anderson was like putting a blind psychotic elephant in charge of a
three-week old baby. It was bound to have ended up as a dawdling
monstrosity, a life-sapping endurance test that strains the patience of
even the most committed sci-fi enthusiast. The combined effect of
Anderson's lumbering direction, poor special effects and a lacklustre
script doused with outbursts of tedious sermonising is not one
for the faint-hearted or the easily bored.
The Martian Chronicles is
definitely not classic sci-fi. It is an Ozymandias-like monument
to the hubris of television executives.
© James Travers 2014
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.