Film Review
In this, one of Hammer's weirder offerings, Bette Davis goes into
hyperdrive and turns in the most outrageous performance of her career
as the one-eyed, fork-tongued mother from Hell. Forget Dracula,
the Mummy and Frankenstein's monster. Hammer's scariest monster
creation can only be the supremely evil Mrs Taggart, played with
spine-tingling zeal by Davis at her most wondrously uninhibited.
Davis's manic laugh alone is enough to give you recurring nightmares.
Based on Bill MacIlwraith's popular play of the same name,
The Anniversary was generally
ill-received when it first came out but is now considered something of
a comedy classic, mainly on the strength of Davis's powerhouse bravura
turn. Where else can you expect to find a villainous matriarch who
happily sports a colour-coordinated eye patch, spits metal-corroding
venom at everything that crosses her path and exerts greater control
over her offspring than Stalin ever had over Soviet Russian in his
heyday?
This was not Bette Davis's first Hammer outing. She had
previously starred in the classy psychological thriller
The
Nanny (1965), in which she gave a tour de force performance
of an altogether different kind. Although the actress is reputed
to have enjoyed her occasional sallies into British cinema, making
The Anniversary was not the
happiest of experiences, for her or the production team.
The fireworks began when Davis had a major falling out with director
Alvin Rakoff, barely ten days into the shoot. Davis being the
star, Rakoff had to be dismissed and Roy Ward Baker, one of Hammer's
more experienced and competent directors, stepped in to take his
place. Rakoff's sacking was ill-received by the rest of the cast,
particularly Sheila Hancock, who resented the attention that was being
lavished on Davis. The vile that we see on screen is probably a
fair reflection of the antagonism that was felt backstage during the
making of this film.
Although
The Anniversary had
a troubled production, the end result is one of Hammer's slickest and
most entertaining films, vastly superior to the bulk of the comedies
that the studio would make in the following decade. The jokes
come thick and fast, with some of the humour so dark that it can only
be described as sick. All of the principals appear to have great
fun hurling vile and abuse at one another, and none more so than a
delightfully ballsy Sheila Hancock. But this is Bette
Davis's film and, no matter how great the supporting contributions, she
was always going to triumph, like Boudicca reincarnated in a crimson
eye patch. Bette Davis played many villains in her time, but none
are as deliciously cruel or overtly camp as her Mrs Taggart. You
have to see it to believe it, and then spend the next five years in
therapy.
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Roy Ward Baker film:
Scars of Dracula (1970)
Film Synopsis
Mrs Taggart runs her late husband's house building business with an
iron hand and an implacable ruthlessness, and she manages her three
grown-up sons in much the same way. But the worms are beginning
to turn and a showdown is due - on the date on which the Taggart family
comes together to celebrate the redoubtable matriarch's wedding
anniversary. The youngest son, Tom, turns up with his
fiancée, whom he is determined to marry despite his mother's so
far unbroken track record of wrecking his engagements. The middle
son, Terry, is planning to emigrate to Canada with his headstrong wife
and their five children, although he will be lucky to get as far as
Croydon. At least Mrs Taggart can rely on her eldest son, Henry,
not to abandon her. He may be a closet transvestite who
goes around swiping women's underwear from clothes lines in the dead of
night, but he at least respects a mother's wishes. Of course Mrs
Taggart has no intention of letting Tom and Terry go. She is
confident that, by the time the evening is through, she will have
crushed this little rebellion once and for all. After all, a
mother knows what's best for her children...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.