Film Review
Stanley Kubrick's first true masterpiece,
Paths of Glory offers the most
powerful antiwar statement since Lewis Milestone's
All Quiet on the Western Front
(1930) and is a film that seethes with humanist indignation, evoking
much the same reaction in its audience. In common with much of
Kubrick's subsequent work, the film has an obvious anti-authoritarian
agenda and rails against the abuse of power by those who merely use
their position in society for their own end. Not for the last
time in his career, Kubrick proved to be ahead of his time. Over
the next decade, such loathing and mistrust for authority and the
established order would become widespread across most of the western
world, having an enormous impact on contemporary cinema. Kubrick
would be in the vanguard of this cultural and political new wave.
The film was as much a personal venture for Kirk Douglas as it was for
Kubrick. Without the actor's financial support, the film probably
would never have been made, and it was Douglas who persuaded the
director not to go for the traditional Hollywood happy
ending. The
character of Dax, a rugged idealist, appears to have been tailor-made
for Douglas and the actor (helped by a well-crafted screenplay)
gives
one of his finest performances.
Paths of Glory was immensely
controversial when it was first released - not surprising as it was the
most high profile overtly anti-war film made since the end of the
Second World War. The French government in particular were not
impressed by the film; acting under pressure from the military and war
veterans, they discouraged the film's distributor, United Artists, from
releasing the film in France. The film was not shown in that
country until 1975. Understandably, Kubrick was unable to shoot
the film France, and so it was made, ironically, in Germany.
Paths of Glory may not be the
most subtle of anti-war films, but it is remarkably effective.
There is not one line that comes out of George Macready's mouth which
doesn't make you want to pick up a brick and hurl it at the
screen in disgust (an expensive indulgence if you have just forked out
on a new widescreen plasma TV). "Yes, I know how to boost
morale. Let's just round up a few snivelling cowards and have
them shot. Nothing better." The sad fact is that
whilst General Mireau may veer towards caricature he is a fairly
accurate representation of a career officer at the time of the First
World War - dehumanised to the point that he regards his troops as
expendable military equipment, not human beings, and can anticipate an
eighty per cent wastage (of human life) in a military manoeuvre without
batting an eyelid. It is hard to know which is more horrific -
the industrial-scale slaughter of troops as they embark on an
unwinnable assault on an enemy position or the complete disregard for
the value of human life shown by the bloodless generals.
Perhaps none of Kubrick's films bears the author's stamp so visibly as
this one. The most individualistic of filmmakers made this a
personal crusade against those that seek to crush individuality (the
generals we see in the film presumably being a proxy for unsympathetic
film producers and distributors who put profit before art).
The film is also a major technical achievement for a young filmmaker,
presaging his subsequent work with its inventive camerawork and
striking visual design (for which the German cinematographer Georg Krause
should take some credit). Shot in high contrast black and white,
often with unsettling camera angles, the film has a stark film noir
texture that provides a sense of confinement which grows as Dax's
attempts to save his men from a firing squad proves increasingly
futile.
Note also the difference in style between the way in which the ordinary
men on the battlefield and the officers in their opulent surroundings
are shot. The camera movements and lighting in the château
scenes have an elegance and artificiality that contrasts with the more
realist approach adopted for the sequences set in the trenches and no
man's land. The film shows us two completely different worlds -
one of privilege that is mired in decadence and hypocrisy, the other of
unspeakable horror that is composed of mud, blood and fear.
Whilst Dax may fail to bridge the gulf between these two worlds he does
offer us a glimmer of hope that one day humanity and compassion will
triumph over tyranny and ignorance. It can be argued that the one
tangible victory of the First World War was that it hastened the demise
of a rotten class system and brought a healthier shade of democracy and
social equality to the continent of Europe. It's a pity that it
took another global conflict to complete the job.
© James Travers 2009
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Stanley Kubrick film:
Spartacus (1960)
Film Synopsis
By 1916, the war in Europe has arrived at a virtual impasse. On
both sides, the progress made in one year is measured in metres and
paid for by tens of thousands of soldiers' lives. To safeguard
his reputation and advance his career, the French General Broulard
needs a decisive military victory. To that end, he coerces his
subordinate, General Mireau into launching an attack on an impregnable
German position, the Ant Hill. Mireau passes the order onto
Colonel Dax, who commands the 701st infantry regiment. Dax
is dismayed by the order. His men are suffering from battle
fatigue and he knows that the Ant Hill is too well defended to be taken
without massive casualties. When Mireau threatens to have him
relieved, Dax has no choice but to comply. As expected, the push
proves to be an unmitigated disaster. Most of the soldiers
are unable to leave their trenches because the enemy fire is so
intense. Those that do make it into no man's land are cut down
instantly or forced to retreat. When Mireau's order for his
gunners to open fire on his own troops is disobeyed, the general
decides that desperate measures are called for if he is to instil some
discipline into his men. He decrees that one soldier be selected
from each of the three companies and be subjected to a court martial,
charged with cowardice. Appalled by this injustice, Dax decides
to defend the men at their trial, but soon realises that he has no
chance of saving them...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.