Film Review
The mysterious deaths of Archduke Rudolph and his teenage lover Marie Vetsera
at a pivotal moment in the history of Austro-Hungary have long been a cause
of speculation, with several books and films offering plausible
explanations to account for this real-life
Romeo and Juliet tragedy.
Interest in Rudolph's death is justified by its historical significance -
it was an event that not only sounded the death knell for the Austro-Hungarian
Empire, it also brought about the circumstances for two devastating world
wars and much of what followed. The twentieth century would have been
very different if that fateful meeting at Mayerling had never taken
place on that cold winter's night in 1889.
Claude Anet's 1930 novel
Idyll's End proferred the most likely account
of the death of the the crown prince Rodlph and Marie Vetsera - a double
suicide - and this is the version that Anatole Litvak was content to serve
up in his film
Mayerling (1936),
starring Charles Boyer and Danielle Darrieux (later
remade in 1968 by Terence Young).
As plausible as the suicide theory was, there was always a suspicion that
Archduke Rudolph did not kill himself but was in fact the victim of a political
assassination motivated to preserve the unity of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
It wasn't until the 1940s that these suspicions were apparently substantiated
by tangible (albeit questionable) evidence. Inspired by this 'new evidence',
Jean Delannoy's
Le Secret de Mayerling presents an alternative story to that
seen in Litvak's film, dispensing with the convenient romantic myth and showing
how the unfortunate Archduke may have met his end as a victim of a cold blooded
political machination.
By this stage in his career, Jean Delannoy had firmly established himself
as one of the leading exponents of what would later be termed (in a derogatory
sense) the
quality tradition in French cinema. Before the untethered
Rottweilers and cultural illiterates on the
Cahiers du cinéma had
trashed his reputation, Delannoy was widely revered and by the late 1940s
he already had a string of notable critical and commercial successes to his
name -
Pontcarral, colonel d'empire (1942),
L'Éternel Retour
(1943),
La Symphonie pastorale
(1946).
Le Secret de Mayerling was another prestige
production that was well-received by the critics and a box office success
(it attracted an audience of just under two and half million in France).
It's not hard to account for the film's popularity - in addition to
its crowd-pulling subject matter, it boasts a formidable cast and showcases
French cinema of the period at its grandest, with a production design to
rival any comparable Hollywood feature.
Jean Marais was an easy shoe-in for the role of the doomed Archduke Rodolph
- the big budget costume drama was the milieu in which the actor appeared
most at home, as he had already demonstrated in Jean Cocteau's
L'Aigle à deux têtes
(1947). Interestingly, this earlier film had been inspired by the assassination
of the Empress Elisabeth of Austria, the mother of the character that Marais
played in
Le Secret de Mayerling. In the latter film, the part
of the Empress Elisabeth went to Marguerite Jamois, who was the actress Cocteau
originally had in mind for the lead female role in
L'Aigle à deux
têtes. Making a remarkable screen debut in the role of Marie
Vetsera (Marais's exquisitely fragile screen lover) is the 21-year-old Dominique
Blanchar, daughter of the legendary French actor of stage and screen, Pierre
Blanchar. The extraordinary cast includes many other notable performers,
not least of which is Claude Farrell, who leaves a memorable impression as
the calculating Marie Larisch, one of the film's more interesting characters.
Surprisingly, the film begins at the end of the tragic tale, with the immediate
aftermath of the death of the Archduke Rudolph. Moodly lit with some
quite eerie expressionistic touches, this sombre opening can hardly fail
to send a shiver down the spine and establishes a suitably oppressive mood
for what follows, an extended flashback that has none of the drippy romanticism
of Litvak's film. Typically, Delannoy eschews soppy sentimentality
and sticks with cold realism throughout, the result being one
of the bleakest and most crushingly prosaic of his films. Far more
time is devoted to political intrigue than the burgeoning romance between
the Archduke and his teen admirer (Marais doesn't even appear on screen until
the third reel). Jacques Rémy's script makes Rudolph a far more
ambiguous and somewhat less sympathetic character than Boyer's interpretation
in
Mayerling, and this allows Marais to give one of his more nuanced
performances, totally convincing as a dissipated political agitator tired
of life and yet not ready to die.
The haunting solemity of the film's opening (the most memorable of any Jean
Delannoy film) is matched by the intensely grim tone of its ending - Hitchcock
could hardly have brought more devilishly controlled tension to the impending
climax. The historical accuracy of
Le Secret de Mayerling has
been widely disputed but the film still brings a frightening plausibility
to one of the possible explanations for Archduke Rudolph's death. Even
if you find it hard to accept this version of events, it is still a profoundly
unsettling piece of cinema - a chilling reminder of how far those who have
political power are willing to stoop in pursuit of their aims.
© James Travers 2016
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Jean Delannoy film:
Dieu a besoin des hommes (1950)