Film Review
It says something that upon its original release in 1974
Lacombe Lucien was described as
dangerous by the same quality French newspaper that had previously
hailed it as a masterpiece.
Even as late as the mid-1970s, thirty years after the Liberation, France was not yet ready to accept the
reality of its wartime record and instead clung to the fabricated
version of history that General de Gaulle had authorised upon coming to
power. In this version, France had been a nation of heroic
résistants, actively opposing the Occupation and making the job
of the Allies that much easier when they deigned to launch their
offensive in June 1944. It wasn't until the late 1960s,
early 1970s that the true picture emerged. In Marcel Ophüls'
celebrated documentary
Le Chagrin et la pitié
(1969) the resistance myth was blown apart, revealing that, far from
being involved in the resistance, most French people had been
attentistes, tolerating but neither
opposing nor supporting the occupying power, whilst a significant
minority had in fact been actively collaborating with the Nazis.
(There was even some evidence that the French government had used the
Occupation as a cover to pursue its own anti-Semitic agenda.)
This was the truth that no one wanted to hear, but it was a truth that
director Louis Malle felt impelled to explore in
Lacombe Lucien, his most
provocative and ambitious film.
Louis Malle was one of the first commentators on the Occupation to
avoid the kind of spurious Manichean didacticism that had previously
characterised France's wartime relationship with the Nazis. It
is significant that the central character in
Lacombe Lucien - the 18-year-old
Lucien - is not someone we can entirely hate (as one of the other
characters in the film says of him), in spite of the despicable acts he
commits and his apparent lack of conscience. Lucien is corrupted
by evil, used for evil ends, but he himself is neither evil nor
good. Instead, he exists in a state of moral confusion and
ambivalence, incapable of realising the evil he himself
perpetrates. Lucien is the proverbial mixed-up teenager who
happens to get mixed up with an evil regime before his adult sense of
responsibility has a chance to assert itself.
Lacombe Lucien is as much a
coming-of-age drama as it is a study in the corruption of innocence and
can be seen as a companion piece to Malle's previous portrayal of
adolescent awakening
Le Souffle au coeur
(1971). It is Lucien's lack of moral awareness that make him so
vulnerable to the lure of Nazi evil, to the easily gained power and
sense of self-importance that will give him what he needs most, an
adult identity. No, we cannot hate Lucien - he is merely
doing what all human beings are prone to do: seizing an opportunity
that allows him to acquire a feeling of self-worth. It is
probably this which made the film so unpalatable to French audiences
and reviewers in the mid-1970s, the notion that ordinary people could
become complicit in an evil régime through unthinking
naivety. How much easier was is to accept the de Gaulle fiction
that the collaborators had been a minority of warped individuals who
were implicitly evil and therefore not representative of France as a
whole.
As well as taking a gamble with the subject of his film, Louis Malle
made the bold decision to cast two complete unknowns in the leading
roles. Concerned that a professional actor would be unable to
supply the veracity he sought for his main character, Malle cast a
22-year-old woodcutter named Pierre Blaise for the part of
Lucien. Although Blaise had absolutely no interest in cinema and
was so unwilling to be an actor that he almost walked off the set at
one point, he was an inspired casting choice and perfectly captures the
innocence and undeveloped persona that the role demands. There is
nothing false or strained in Blaise's performance - he
is Lucien, a confused adolescent
who appears strangely disconnected from the world around him and yet is
so eager to be a part of it. It would have taken a professional
actor of exceptional ability to have made a more convincing Lucien
Lacombe than the one that Blaise portrays with such self-unaware
ease. Blaise did appear in a few films after this one, but he
soon grew disillusioned with acting and returned to his former
woodcutting career. He died tragically in a car accident a year
after the release of
Lacombe Lucien,
aged 23. For the lead female role, Malle cast another
unknown, the young model Aurore Clément, who also proved to be a
highly serendipitous casting choice. Not only is she stunningly
attractive, in an unconventional, pre-Raphaelite way, but she provides
the humanist counterpoint to her co-star's morally vacuous Lucien,
allowing us to see the latter character in a more sympathetic
light. After this remarkable debut, Clément went on to
enjoy a long and distinguished stage and film career.
Louis Malle made
Lacombe Lucien
towards the middle of his career, during what may loosely be termed his
humanist phase. After his eye-opening documentary
Calcutta (1969), which exposed the
extremes of social conditions in modern day India, Malle's cinema
suddenly acquired a far greater sense of personal involvement.
Indeed, his previous films might almost be written off as frivolous
entertainments if they had not been so masterfully made. It was
also around this time that Malle became more provocative, in both the
subjects he tackled and his cinematic approach. Between
Lacombe Lucien, he made
Le Souffle au coeur (1971), an
uncompromising depiction of incest, and
Black
Moon (1975), a bizarre expressionist fantasy that is surely
Malle's weirdest film.
It can reasonably be argued that
Louis Malle's career as a film auteur did not begin until the early
1970s. Certainly his most interesting and challenging work is not
to be found in his early films, but in those he made in the second half
of his career. It was because
Lacombe
Lucien dealt with such difficult issues, and dared to confront
the thorny issue of collaboration honestly and from a uniquely humanist
perspective, that it didn't quite achieve the recognition it
deserved. Not surprisingly, it was judged far more favourably
abroad than at home; it won the Best Film BAFTA in 1975 and was
nominated for an Oscar. Today, the film is rightly considered one
of Malle's great achievements, surpassed only by his other wartime
drama,
Au revoir les enfants (1987).
© James Travers 2011
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Louis Malle film:
Black Moon (1975)