Film Review
Although it is not entirely without interest, Jean Cocteau's first
dalliance with cinema,
Le Sang d'un poète
(1930), was not a great success.
The film's patron, the Vicomte de Noailles, was offended by its apparently anti-bourgeois slant and
forbade it from being widely seen, whilst the critics who did see it
dismissed it as a pale imitation of Buñuel's
L'Âge
d'or (1930). After this discouraging setback, Cocteau
gave up filmmaking and devoted himself to a milieu he was much happier
with, the theatre. It was primarily to further the career of Jean
Marais, his lover, companion and principal muse, that he was lured back
into cinema ten years later, to script the first of his great films,
L'Éternel retour.
Marais had, by this time, become one of the rising stars of the French
stage, although his association with Cocteau was proving to be both a
help and a hindrance. He had appeared in a few films, but had yet
to make a name for himself in cinema. Cocteau's attempts to make
Marais a star had so far been frustrated by the illiberal
collaborationist press, which used the couple's openly gay relationship
to ferment public contempt for both men and their work. Some of
the plays which Cocteau had created for Marais - most notably
Machine à écrire -
were banned for their supposedly anti-Vichy sentiment.
The success of
L'Éternel retour,
their first screen collaboration, must have come as a sweet
victory. The film not only made Marais an overnight film star, it
also gave Cocteau the confidence to resume his filmmaking career.
Unwilling to direct the film himself, Cocteau passed that onerous
responsibility on to Jean Delannoy, a film director for whom he had a
great respect. Delannoy had recently had a major success with
Pontcarral, colonel d'empire
(1942), although the film of his that Cocteau had particularly admired
was
Macao, l'enfer du jeu (1939),
one of the best examples of 1930s French film noir. Delannoy's
reputation would later suffer at the hands of the gravediggers on the
Cahiers du cinéma (notably François Truffaut), who saw
him as the standard bearer of the 'qualité française'
tradition. Delannoy may not have been an auteur (at least not one
that Truffaut would recognise) but he was a master of his craft and
brought considerable flair and artistry to his films, evidenced by
La Symphonie pastorale (1946),
Les Jeux sont faits (1947) and
Les Amitiés particulières
(1964).
Cocteau could not have chosen a better director for his film than
Delannoy, who respected Cocteau's unique poetic vision and did not
attempt to superimpose his own signature on the film.
L'Éternel retour belongs
unmistakably to Jean Cocteau's realm of realist poetry subtly draped in
the trappings of the classic fairytale. Had he been fortunate to
have a larger budget, Cocteau would no doubt have preferred a
historical setting for the film, akin to Marcel Carne's
Les Visiteurs du soir
(1942). Instead, he was forced to have a contemporary setting,
and this gives the film its unique character, where the ancient world
(represented by a Medieval castle and misty island) finds itself in
conflict with the modern world (shown by a circa 1940s garage).
L'Éternel retour is a
dreamlike conflation of the real world as we recognise it and a
sinister Gothic fairytale, in which the past and the present appear to
be folded on top of one another like a fancy multi-layered
gâteau.
It is clear that Cocteau learned a great deal from Delannoy whilst
making this film. The moody lighting and fluid camerawork that
Delannoy frequently employed on his films to heighten the drama would
be borrowed by Cocteau for his films, and are very much in evidence in
La Belle et la bête
(1946) and
L'Aigle à deux têtes
(1948). It was whilst working on
L'Éternel retour that
Cocteau first met some of the talented technicians who would work on
his later films, including the set designer Georges Wakhevitch.
By all accounts, Delannoy, Cocteau and Marais had an extremely good
working relationship and would work together on another film,
La Princesse de Clèves
(1961).
If
L'Éternel retour
marked the start of one prominent screen career (Jean Marais's), it
also provided the high point for another, that of Madeleine
Sologne. After appearing in Jacques Feyder's
Les Gens du voyage (1938) and
Sacha Guitry's
Remontons les
Champs-Élysées (1938), Sologne had her first major
role in Richard Pottier's
Le Monde
tremblera (1939). However, it was her role as the Blonde
Nathalie in
L'Éternel retour
that brought her lasting fame. Her flowing hair, dyed an almost
iridescent blond, made her something of a cultural icon, and was copied
by countless young women as a subtle gesture of defiance during the
Occupation. Alas, Sologne's fame was short-lived and her
subsequent career was blighted by ill-considered roles in lacklustre
films. It was only in
L'Éternel
retour that Madeleine Sologne shone at her brightest, and her
ethereal presence (beautifully complemented by Junie Astor's earthier
Brunette Nathalie) contributes much to the film's arresting poetry.
The other legendary actress to grace the film is Yvonne de Bray, who
very nearly steals the show as Jean Marais's grotesquely spiteful
aunt. A close friend of Cocteau, De Bray had previously triumphed
on stage in his play
Les Monstres
sacrés and would be equally magnificent in his film
version of his play
Les Parents terribles (1948),
in the role he created for her. Yvonne de Bray had a gift for
making her audience sympathise with her characters, no matter how
intolerably venal they first appear. Her character in
L'Éternel retour is one of
the most venomous she ever played, the epitome of the evil fairytale
stepmother, but far from alienating her audience she arouses our pity
and ultimately comes across as a tragic victim of circumstances, not
merely a cruel monster.
The real villain of the piece is not De Bray's wicked aunt but the
hideously malevolent dwarf son that she dotes on, a character played to
perfection by the great Pierre Aleyrangues, better known as
Piéral. Having recently made his screen debut in Marcel
Carné's
Les Visiteurs du soir,
Piéral very nearly makes himself the star of
L'Éternel retour, so
deliciously evil (and darkly humorous) is his character,
Achille. A one-time circus and musical hall performer (famous
for his Mae West impression), Piéral cropped up regularly in
historical films over the next few decades, including Jean Delannoy's
popular
Notre-Dame de Paris (1956), and
would play the diminutive psychologist in Buñuel's
Cet obscur objet du désir
(1977). Cinema's most famous midget actor, Piéral made no
secret of his homosexuality and towards the end of his long and busy
career he appeared in several gay-themed films, including two for
director Guy Gilles.
The film derives its title from Nietzsche's 'eternal return', a belief
that the same patterns in life are destined to repeat themselves over
and over. Cocteau's characters Patrice and Nathalie are evidently
modern versions of Tristan and Isolde, the mythical lovers who were
separated in life but reunited in death. It is easy to read into
the story a subtle allegory of Occupied France, in which Patrice and
Nathalie represent the soul of a nation torn apart by the evil that is
visibly depicted by the dwarf Achille and his manipulative mother
Gertrude. Cocteau's own stance on Nazism and the Occupation is
famously ambivalent, so it is hard to know whether the film was
intended in a subversive vein. An admirer of German art, Cocteau
published an article in 1942 praising the work of the Third Reich's
official sculptor Arno Breker - an article that led him to be charged
as a collaborator after the war. But, far from being a supporter
of Nazism, Cocteau went out of his way to help his friends (Jews and
resistant members) when they fell into the hands of the Gestapo.
The anti-Pétainism that Cocteau's detractors were keen to see in
his work may be no more than an honest assertion of a writer's interest
in the essential truth of human experience and a reluctance to be
influenced by the political flavour of the month. As tempting as
it may be to regard
L'Éternel
retour as a courageous pro-resistance piece (in which Hitler is
represented as a sick, psychopathic dwarf), it is unlikely that
Cocteau, a closet admirer of the Third Reich, saw it as such. It
is not the tragedy of the Occupation that he depicts in the film, nor
the senseless brutality of Fascism, but a much grander calamity - that
perverse streak in human nature that compels us to go on repeating the
mistakes of the past, reliving the same stories like a record being
played over and over again. Maybe free will is an illusion...
© James Travers 2013
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Next Jean Delannoy film:
Le Bossu (1944)