Film Review
After the phenomenal success of
Qu'est-ce qu'on a
fait au Bon Dieu? at the French box office in 2014 (it attracted
an audience of 12.4 million), director Philippe de Chauveron must have thought
he had struck gold with his particular brand of overt racism masquerading
as popular entertainment. He followed his 2014 hit up with more of
the same, first
Débarquement immédiat (2016), and then
À bras ouverts (a.k.a.
Open Arms), plumbing the depths
like no other French filmmaker before him. Can it be a coincidence
that the director's name sounds like
chauvinism?
What is hard to fathom is why Christian Clavier and Elsa Zylberstein, two
intelligent and successful actors who have no difficulty attracting offers
of work, should agree to appear in such bottom-of-the-barrel-scraping fare
as this. Not only is the film offensive (to anyone who is not a card-carrying
member of the most extreme right-wing political party), it isn't remotely
funny and seems to have been thrown together in an afternoon by a half-hearted
and completely talentless film student. Clavier's character (an obvious
caricature of the self-promoting philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy) is
a ludicrously shallow hypocrite who just cannot help committing one racist
faux pas after another.
Worse, the Romany gypsies who have the imprudence to bed down in Clavier's
garden are presented in the most unsympathetic light, not as human beings
but as mole-eating weirdoes who may just have well have come from another
planet. There is an Indian butler (a carbon copy of the bearer character
played by Michael Bates in the BBC television series
It Ain't Half Hot
Mum in the 1970s) who glibly endorses white supremacy to such a degree
that he cannot bring himself to serve anyone of dark complexion. And
we mustn't forget Elsa Zylberstein as Clavier's well-heeled wife, a woman
of artistic pretensions who has absolutely no interest in the world around
her - a sorry emblem of bourgeois intellectual complacency.
À bras ouverts is an extraordinary film, and I mean that in
the worst possible sense. It is extraordinary that such a flagrantly
racist accumulation of puerile ill-conceived dross could ever have entered
anyone's head, let alone made it into a film and allowed to go on general
release across France. It's hard to imagine anything more irresponsible
and socially damaging, at a time when anti-immigrant and racist sentiment
is at an all-time high and centrist politicians of all colours are failing
lamentably to arrest the electorate's inexorable migration towards the far
right.
This is the kind of film that reminds you of those abysmal anti-Semitic films
commissioned by the Nazis in the 1930s and '40s, monstrous attempts to dehumanise
'the other' and make it terrifyingly easy for Hitler's Final Solution to
become a reality. The mainstream success of Philippe de Chauveron and
filmmakers of his ilk should be a cause for concern for us all. Their
flagrantly xenophobic brand of lowbrow comedy can only have the effect of
normalising racism and further aggravating anti-immigrant feeling in France.
Laugh if you want to, but it seems to me that we are slowly heading towards
Holocaust 2.0.
© James Travers 2017
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
Jean-Etienne Fougerole is a prominent figure of France's literary scene,
an intellectual humanist married to a wealthy heiress who, unlike him, has
scant interest in the problems of the world. To promote his latest book,
À bras ouverts, Fougerole appears on television and uses this
as an opportunity to articulate his view that it is the duty of the well-off
to welcome less advantaged people into their homes. Fougerole's critics
take him at his word and the writer has no choice but to give out his home
address to his television audience as a gesture of his good faith. Not
long afterwards, the Fougerole household is disturbed by the sudden appearance
of the Bariks, a family of travellers who have decided by park their caravan
in the Fougeroles ample gardens. Jean-Etienne's wife tries to put on
a brave face, although it is no secret that she shares none of her husband's
concerns for the plight of the world's poor. With the best of intentions,
Fougerole has placed himself in a predicament that will make a martyr of
any humanist do-gooder. Of the course, the Bariks intend to make the
most of the opportunity that Fate has granted them, repaying their benefactor's
generosity in ways he hadn't even imagined...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by filmsdefrance.com and must not be copied.