|
|
|
Lacenaire
1990 History / Drama
| |
Credits
-
Director: Francis Girod
-
Script: Georges Conchon, Francis Girod
-
Photo: Bruno de Keyzer
-
Music: Laurent Petitgirard
-
Cast: Daniel Auteuil (Pierre-François
Lacenaire),
Jean Poiret (Allard),
Jacques Weber (Jacques Arago),
François Périer (Le père
de Lacenaire),
Geneviève Casile (La mère de Lacenaire),
Jean Davy (Alphonse Damoiseau),
Jacques Duby (Marmignat),
Paul Le Person (Vigouroux),
Maïwenn Le Besco (Hermine),
Jacques Sereys (Pertuizet),
Rufus (Canler),
Gérard Desarthe (Tonnelier)
-
Country: France
-
Language: French
-
Runtime: 125 min
-
Aka: The Elegant Criminal
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary
In the 1830s, Pierre-François Lacenaire was the most notorious criminal in France.
From an early age, he rebelled against his comfortable bourgeois background, managing
to get himself expelled from a Jesuit seminary. Thereafter, he made a career of
antagonising the Church, the army and the middle classes through his conduct and intemperate
writings. And so began his short, but eventful, career of violent crime. With
hired henchman to do his dirty work, Lacenaire killed and murdered with gay abandon, almost
as if it were his duty to society. Soon, he is caught and tried. In his prison
cell whilst he awaits execution, he drafts his memoirs, to be published after his death.
Review
Daniel Auteuil is on fine form in this slick period drama which paints an accurate and
uncompromising portrait of one of France’s most famous criminals. The inspiration
for Dostoevsky’s “Crime and Punishment”, Pierre-François Lacenaire
was the kind of self-obsessed amoral sociopath who was both loved and feared by a country
that was still coming to terms with the fallout from the French Revolution and the subsequent
Napoleonic wars. Lacenaire epitomised France’s intellectual elite at the time,
contemptuous of conventional ideology and zealously attacking the establishment, partly
through vanity, partly through disillusionment with the revolution, but also through some
misguided belief that a better society could only be built once the ordinary man had freed
himself from the shackles of a self-serving, all-controlling State. If it meant
killing a few old women along the way, so be it.
The film attempts to de-construct Lacenaire, rather like a pathologist might perform
an autopsy. Having shown us the condemned man’s last few hours before his
execution, the film pieces together his life through a series of nested flashbacks.
Whilst the approach is original and allows some degree of narrative economy, the film
inevitably feels fragmented, passionless and, at times, confusing. The film cannot
be faulted on the quality of its sets, attention to period detail, and cinematography.
Excellence in these areas only shows up the weaknesses in others – too much attention
is given too the mechanics of the execution and Larcenaire’s criminal exploits,
there is a lack of human feeling in the drama, and some of the characters feel painfully
two-dimensional.
Fortunately, there is a trump card, in the form Daniel Auteuil’s
performance, which switches from great intimacy and sensitivity to manic excess without
losing any sense of conviction. Where the film is strongest and most poignant in
its portrayal of the (very probably homosexual) relationship between Larcenaire and his
loyal associate Avril. By contrast, the rapport between Larcenaire and Allard, the
police chief who arrests him and who is entrusted with publishing his autobiography, is
not so convincing. It may not be a masterpiece, but we probably get a far
better idea of the man who was Pierre-François Lacenaire from this film than we
do from Marcel Carné’s Les
Enfants du paradis (1945).
© James Travers 2005
|
|
Buy this film:
|
|
|
|
